There will be in the next generation or so … a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel — by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.
—
Aldous Huxley, 1961 (via poortaste) (via emptymoments)
Note: 3rd reblog. I actually discovered emptymoments’ tumblr from his comments/notes on the socialism reblog and he was one of the few who was anti-that post so at first I thought: “Hmm… I really didn’t want to comment on that reblog because it was more wit than substance… but hmm… this guy posted something closer to my views…”
“tick tock” “tick tock”
In the end, I decided not to post his notes because it wasn’t really much substance either (basically just a rebuttal) so I thought I’d just follow his blog and this turns out to be his latest post/reblog at the time and once again, I had the same feelings of not reblogging… Felt this comment was too “quote-ish” and does no justice to Aldous Huxley but then unlike his notes for that reblog, this one did mention Aldous Huxley and the guy is just understated outside of certain niches.
Hell, I think most people who accuse us of being parasite singles by default don’t even know that there is a whole gamut of political texts that give good reasons why we as a society are heading towards the path of leeches “beyond” the confines of just living off of our parents’ means.
I even think that there is probably a good proportion of these people who when introduced to these texts would still rationalize that the parasite single is leeching off worse than what people who are mindlessly leeching off society is doing if only due to the fact that they’re so focused on the “poor parent” (who is often willingly promoting this behaviour and isn’t as poor as they think they are) rather than the actual effects of the actions being done.
…but, that said, arguing for this from any man’s point of view is challenging because it’s not only the separation of parasite single and welfare brainwashed people that’s “the” factor but also separating Hikikomoris from parasite singles and then combining it to factor those Hikikomoris who are both Hikikomoris AND parasite singles.
Never an easy argument because the defender of this theme cannot afford to be ignorant of politics, parenting, parasite singles, welfare and facts …and then needing to mix this with Hikikomoris. That’s why I’d rather not focus on that issue for now and instead reblog this instead.
I’m not using Aldous Huxley’s writings to serve as my revisionist foil and pretend he said something to defend us Hikikomoris but until the day comes when I or some other Hiki has the tools to state the parasite single argument in a satisfactory quality that would make the dissenters second-think their brash and biased opinions, sharing the name Aldous Huxley doesn’t seem to be a bad enough thing, insufficient quote or not.